As fleets head into 2026, the challenge is no longer a lack of available technology. According to Grant Andrews, Managing Director at Uniqco, the real issue is how well organisations are structured to use it.
Based on Uniqco’s long-standing experience reviewing fleet maturity across local and state government, Andrews says most Australian fleets remain positioned in the middle of the maturity curve.
“Most Australian fleets are sitting in the mid-range of the maturity curve,” he says. “There have been significant advances in available technology, and many organisations have achieved incremental gains.”
However, those gains are often constrained by internal frameworks rather than technical capability.
Legacy systems continue to cap fleet value
According to Andrews, around 80 per cent of fleets remain limited by corporate IT and financial management environments that restrict integration across systems.
“Around 80 per cent of fleets remain constrained by existing corporate IT and financial management frameworks, which often limits integration.”
Grant Andrews, Managing Director at Uniqco
As a result, fleet data is typically fragmented across asset management platforms, fleet systems, telematics solutions, and safety tools. While these systems may individually deliver improvements, collectively they often fall short of enabling strategic decision-making.
“The result is fragmented or siloed data,” Andrews says. “While these disparate systems have delivered measurable improvements in maintenance compliance — and, in turn, operational efficiency — they tend to cap the overall value that can be realised.”
Data quality and confidence remain major barriers
Looking back at 2025, Andrews says the most significant barriers to deeper technology adoption were structural rather than technical.
“Unless critical datasets can be validated across at least two or three independent sources and interrogated collectively, reporting accuracy is compromised and decision-making confidence remains low,” he says.
This lack of confidence is compounded by limited internal capability. Many fleet teams, Andrews notes, are stretched operationally and lack the time or skills to manage data strategically rather than tactically.
Change management also remains a major hurdle.
“Technology is frequently deployed without the organisational alignment, communication, and leadership support required to embed it into daily workflows,” he says.
Executive understanding still limits investment
Another ongoing constraint is the difficulty fleet teams face in articulating value in terms that resonate with senior executives.
“A lack of understanding at senior executive level around the true cost savings and risk reduction that mature fleet management can deliver continues to restrict investment,” Andrews says.
Without clear visibility of return on investment — particularly where operational data is not linked to financial outcomes — executive teams remain cautious.
“Without that linkage, it remains difficult to quantify savings in a way that resonates with CFOs,” he says, which in turn limits how strategic fleet management can become.
2026 will reward fleets that connect data to outcomes
Looking ahead, Andrews expects fleet technology adoption to remain uneven in 2026. While some organisations will continue to struggle with the same structural constraints, others are well positioned to move beyond compliance-focused use of technology.
“Fleets that have already invested in technologies such as telematics, and are using them correctly, are well positioned to move beyond minimum compliance,” he says.
However, progress will be limited to those organisations that can integrate operational data with financial outcomes and use that insight to inform decisions rather than simply satisfy compliance requirements.
“In short, the opportunity is there,” Andrews says, “but real advancement in 2026 will be limited to organisations that can connect operational data with financial outcomes and use that insight to drive decisions.”
What mature fleets will do differently in 2026
According to Andrews, the most mature fleet operations in 2026 will distinguish themselves through both technology and behaviour.
“The most mature fleet operations will be those that can aggregate and interrogate data across traditionally siloed systems and translate it into clear, credible insights for senior leadership.”
Grant Andrews, Managing Director at Uniqco
Beyond systems, Andrews emphasises the importance of clear processes and accountability.
“Implementing clear fleet standard operating procedures and holding operators accountable for performance is critical,” he says, adding that education, recognition, and reward deliver far more sustainable outcomes than enforcement alone.
Another key differentiator will be the ability to articulate the true cost of disruption.
“When operational impacts are expressed in financial and service terms, they quickly gain the attention of senior management,” Andrews says.
A broader view of fleet risk
Finally, Andrews believes mature fleets will increasingly be expected to articulate a holistic view of fleet risk.
“Mature fleets will be those that can capture and report a total fleet risk profile across consistent categories — financial, safety, environmental, reputational, and service interruption,” he says.
This level of reporting, he notes, does more than identify exposure.
“It clearly reveals the strength or weakness of fleet culture within an organisation.”
For Fleet Managers preparing for 2026, Andrews’ message is clear: technology is necessary, but maturity — across systems, skills, and leadership — is what ultimately unlocks value.
- Cupra Leon VZ Review: The Hot Hatch That Makes Everyday Driving Feel Special
The Cupra Leon VZ is one of those cars that quietly surprises you. On paper, it looks like a sensible hatchback. In the car park, it blends in just enough to keep a low profile. But spend a week behind the wheel and you quickly realise this isn’t just transport — it’s a car that brings a - Mitsubishi ASX Aspire Review: Better Looking, Better Inside, But No Longer a Fleet BargainFor years, the Mitsubishi ASX was the safe, sensible choice sitting quietly in the value corner of the showroom. It was familiar, affordable, and easy to justify to a Fleet Manager with a spreadsheet in one hand and a depreciation forecast in the other. This new ASX Aspire is not that car anymore. Yes, it
- HiAce vs Farizon V7E: The Diesel Benchmark Meets the Electric DisruptorFor years, the diesel van has been the quiet achiever of Australian fleets. Reliable, capable and easy to deploy, the Toyota HiAce became the default choice for trades, couriers and service technicians. But the arrival of the Farizon V7E signals a shift. Not because it replaces the HiAce overnight—but because it introduces a realistic electric alternative at a price
- Triton 2025: The Fleet Ute That Beats Ranger & HiLux on Whole of Life CostsThe 2025 Mitsubishi Triton GSR Dual Cab Chassis makes a strong case as a fit-for-purpose fleet ute, especially when whole-of-life costs are the priority. In a market dominated by the Ford Ranger, Toyota HiLux and Isuzu D-Max, Triton sits just behind the leaders in sales, but its value proposition is where it stands out. When
- The Day a Loaded Ute Met a Loaded TruckIt started as a straightforward comparison. Same load. Same conditions. Same job. But this wasn’t a random test. It was part of a deliberately staged demonstration run by Isuzu Trucks in March, where a group of motoring journalists were invited to put light trucks and utes through identical tasks. The objective was clear enough: show —
