Road User Charges: Are Fleets Paying Their Share?

For decades, governments have relied on fuel excise to fund the construction and maintenance of roads. Every litre of petrol or diesel purchased contributes a set amount in tax, effectively charging road users in proportion to how much they drive and how inefficient their vehicles are.

But the system is breaking down. Modern vehicles are far more fuel-efficient than they were 10 or 20 years ago, meaning drivers are travelling further while paying less in fuel tax. And as fleets accelerate their transition to hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and eventually battery electric vehicles (BEVs), the revenue collected to fund road infrastructure continues to shrink.

Governments have known this challenge was coming for years. That’s why road user charging (RUC) – taxing based on distance travelled rather than fuel consumed – is now firmly on the policy agenda.

Fleets Are Already Paying Less

One argument missing from the current public debate is that it’s not just EVs that are paying less towards road upkeep. Hybrid and plug-in hybrid fleets are already contributing significantly less than they used to.

For example, if your fleet used to run vehicles consuming 10 litres per 100km, and you replace them with hybrids consuming just 5 litres per 100km, then the amount of fuel excise you’re paying drops by 50%. Yet your vehicles are still using the same roads, requiring the same level of maintenance and investment.

This reduction in tax revenue is invisible to many Fleet Managers. They are rightly focused on lowering fuel costs and reducing emissions, but the unintended consequence is a shrinking pool of road funding. In practice, fleets of all sizes have been contributing less to road infrastructure for years – long before EVs began to take meaningful market share.

Missing the Hybrid Story

Much of the media coverage frames road user charging as an “EV problem.” Critics argue that EVs don’t pay their fair share because they don’t use fuel at all, while supporters counter that EV adoption should be encouraged to reduce emissions.

But the truth is more complex. The hybrid fleet – now common across business and government – already represents a major shift in how much tax is being collected. Fleets that have halved their fuel consumption have also halved their contribution to road funding.

This point has not been strongly represented in the debate, yet it strengthens the government’s case: a new tax model is not just about fairness between EV and ICE drivers, it’s about long-term sustainability of road funding as efficiency gains across the board reduce fuel excise revenue.

What It Means for Fleets

For fleet operators, the implications are significant:

• Cost planning: Road user charges will eventually replace or complement fuel excise. Fleets need to anticipate this as part of whole-of-life cost calculations.
• Equity between fuel types: A distance-based charge levels the playing field between ICE, hybrid, PHEV, and BEV fleets. The days of hybrids quietly enjoying lower tax contributions may be numbered.
• Policy certainty: Transition plans should account for the fact that RUC will likely be phased in over the next decade. Fleets already evaluating EV adoption should include RUC scenarios in their modelling.
• Operational data: Telematics and odometer reporting will become critical tools in calculating and validating RUC payments. Fleets that already invest in data capture will be well positioned for the change.

The Road Ahead

Governments are not introducing road user charging to penalise EV drivers, despite how the debate is sometimes framed. The shift is about securing a stable, fair revenue stream for road infrastructure in an era where efficiency gains – across hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and EVs – have undermined the old fuel excise model.

For fleets, the change is inevitable. Whether your vehicles run on petrol, diesel, hybrid, or electricity, road user charging will bring new costs and new compliance requirements. Smart fleet managers should start planning now, not only for EV adoption but for the tax structures that will follow.

• 
  MG Expands Fleet EV Choices with Urban, MG4 Refresh and S6
  MG Motor Australia says its expanding EV range is designed to give fleet buyers more choice as organisations balance cost pressures, operational requirements and emissions-reduction targets. The strategy centres on the new MG4 EV Urban as a practical and accessible fleet option, alongside the refreshed MG4 hatch and the forthcoming MG S6, which is expected
• 
  AI Won’t Replace Fleet Managers — It Will Make Them More Strategic
  Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing the fleet industry, but according to the presenters at the AfMA Summit, the technology is not designed to replace Fleet Managers. Instead, it is removing administration and data analysis so fleet professionals can spend more time making strategic decisions. Introducing the Solutions Spotlight session, AfMA President Eden Shirley (and Founder
• 
  Fuel Theft Is Hiding in Plain Sight — AI and Telematics Are Finally Finding It
  Rising fuel prices are putting pressure on fleet operating budgets, but they may also be exposing a problem many organisations don’t realise they have: fuel theft. In a discussion with fleet technology specialists Webfleet and Roev at Sustainability Business Live 2026, advances in telematics and artificial intelligence are making it easier to identify fuel anomalies
• 
  JMACX Gives Ranger Super Duty a Tougher Ride
  JMACX Off Road Solutions has launched a new Coil Over Leaf Conversion Kit for the Ford Ranger Super Duty, with the Australian manufacturer targeting fleet and commercial operators that need more comfort and control from heavily loaded vehicles. The Ford Ranger Super Duty is expected to play a significant role in heavy-duty light commercial fleets,
• 
  Fleet Cameras Are Finally Delivering a Clear ROI
  For years, Fleet Managers have debated whether in-cab cameras and video telematics were worth the investment. Concerns around driver acceptance, privacy and implementation costs often slowed adoption, while many organisations struggled to quantify the return on investment. According to Chris Martin, Senior Manager, Solutions Engineering – APAC at Geotab, that conversation is changing rapidly. While